Assessment Cases

A high-level summary of an effort to assess the predictive capability of BISON, a nuclear fuel performance code, is presented. This assessment was focused mainly on LWR fuel, and to a lesser degree, TRISO particle fuel. A comparison of BISON simulation results to a variety of experimental measurements of instrumented LWR fuel rods are shown. The source of LWR experimental data is primarily from the IAEA's FUMEX program. Benchmark simulation results of TRISO-coated particles are compared to BISON simulations. The TRISO benchmark simulations originate from the IAEA Coordinated Research Program. A brief discussion of material models and modeling approaches is also presented. There was a concerted effort to avoid model tuning to a particular set of experimental measurements. The material models and approaches were reviewed by the BISON team, and a subset of these were used for all the BISON simulations.

Overall, BISON simulations compare quite well with LWR experimental measurements and benchmark TRISO simulations.

BISON and its supporting software is updated and modified frequently. Structured after the regression testing system, an automated system runs all validation cases daily. Running the complete set of validation cases regularly provides the ability to determine how code modifications affect the comparisons. As this automated system evolves, each case will be compared to results from several prior runs and to the available experimental data. Statistical analysis and plotting will permit an evaluation of code validation status and an indication of whether code changes have adversely affected simulation/experiment comparisons. Systematic comparisons to experimental data will be made in each of the several validation areas.

For BISON to reach the status of being generally considered as a validated code and useful predictive tool, it is essential that the simulation-to-experiment comparison database expands and improves. As each new case is analyzed, it will be added to the set that are run daily. In addition, the validation system is available to users to permit addition of their own cases and allow them to analyze cases according to their specific validation requirements.

LWR

Our general approach to evaluating BISON as a predictive tool for LWR fuel is to use trusted, well-known and well-documented experiments, mostly from the FUMEX-II (IAEA, 2002-2007) and FUMEX-III (IAEA, 2008-2012) international research projects. As cases are completed, they are documented and made available to all BISON users via the Enterprise GitHub repository. Each document contains an overview of the specific experiment, specifications of geometry and materials, and simplifications and assumptions used for simulation. Each document also includes boundary conditions used and specific BISON models used for simulation. The results are compared to experimental data and, in some instances, simulation results from other fuel performance codes. A section at the end of each document is reserved for discussion on the simulation, what issues were encountered, and how those issues were resolved along with assumptions and simplifications made to data used as input.

The BISON LWR validation effort includes three areas: separate effects experiments, integral fuel rod experiments and accident behavior.

benchmark
validation

TRISO

benchmark
validation

Metallic Fuel

EBRII
FBTA
FFTF
TREAT
WPF

Nitride Fuel

EBRII
JOYO
MTR
PW-CANEL

Carbide Fuel

EBRII

Mixed Oxide (MOX)

FFTF
JOYO

References

  1. IAEA. Fuel Modelling at Extened Burnup (FUMEX-II): Report of a Coordinated Research Project 2002-2007. Technical Report IAEA-TECDOC-1687, International Atomic Energy Agency, 2002-2007.[BibTeX]
  2. IAEA. Improvement of Computer Codes Used for Fuel Behaviour Simulation (FUMEX-III): Report of a Coordinated Research Project 2008-2012. Technical Report IAEA-TECDOC-1697, International Atomic Energy Agency, 2008-2012.[BibTeX]