JOYO Experiments

Overview

Two uranium–plutonium UN fuel pins with different He-gap widths were irradiated at a linear heating rate 75 kW/m to 4.3% FIMA in the experimental fast reactor JOYO MK-II, and nondestructive and destructive post irradiation examinations were carried out. The UN pellets were loaded into 15Cr-20Ni stainless steel cladding tubes, irradiated in a fast-test reactor, JOYO, and destructively examined after reaching a burnup of 4.3% FIMA (fraction of initial metal atom). Pin geometry, irradiation conditions, fuel swelling, fission-gas release, and microstructural data were published in Tanaka et al. (2004).

Test Description

The JOYO test consisted of two helium-bonded MN pins (L413 and L414) that were irradiated in the experimental fast reactor JOYO to investigate the role of gap size on pin swelling. Subsequently, nondestructive and destructive post irradiation examinations were carried out in hot cells. In particular, fission gas and swelling behavior during irradiation were investigated in detail (Tanaka et al., 2004). These two pins are listed as assessment cases in BISON for MN fuel. The L413 and L414 pins had the same rod design and similar irradiation condition with only the gap size and a slightly different position in the test reactor varying between the two.

Rod Design Specifications

The fuel was solid cylindrical pellets of MN positioned between insulator and reflective pellets in 15Cr-20Ni stainless steel cladding tubes. Table 1 lists the rod design specifications specifying if the value comes from a direct measurement or was unknown and had to be estimated or calculated.

Table 1: SP-1 Rod Geometry

ParameterValueUnitsSource
BondingHeTanaka et al. (2004)
Pin length1486mmUnknown, fixed as in JOYO-B14 (Maeda et al., 2011; Ikusawa et al., 2017)
Clad material15Cr-20Ni SSTanaka et al. (2004)
Clad OD8.50mmTanaka et al. (2004)
Clad ID7.60mmTanaka et al. (2004)
Clad thickness0.45mmTanaka et al. (2004)
Diametral gap - L4130.32mmTanaka et al. (2004)
Diametral gap - L4140.17mmTanaka et al. (2004)
Smear density - L41377.8%TDTanaka et al. (2004)
Smear density - L41482.2%TDTanaka et al. (2004)
Pellet diameter - L4137.28mmTanaka et al. (2004)
Pellet diameter - L4147.43mmTanaka et al. (2004)
Pellet height~8mmTanaka et al. (2004)
Fuel stack - L413200.1mmTanaka et al. (2004)
Fuel stack - L414198.8mmTanaka et al. (2004)
Bulk density - L41384.8%TDTanaka et al. (2004)
Bulk density - L41486.0%TDTanaka et al. (2004)
Fuel Composition
Pu/(U+Pu)18.6wt%Tanaka et al. (2004)
U235-enrichment19.39wt%Tanaka et al. (2004)
N/M ratio - L4131.00-Tanaka et al. (2004)
N/M ratio - L4141.01-Tanaka et al. (2004)
Top/bottom plug4.8mmUnknown, fixed as in MTR-SNAP50
Bottom gap under pellet375mmEstimated based on Fig. 4 in Tanaka et al. (2004)
Plenum height - L413901.3mmCalculated (Pin length-Fuel stack-2*Top/bottom plug-Bottom gap under pellet)
Plenum height - L414902.6mmCalculated (Pin length-Fuel stack-2*Top/bottom plug-Bottom gap under pellet)
Fill gas pressure0.1MPaUnknown, fixed equal to what is used in JOYO-B14 (Maeda et al., 2011; Ikusawa et al., 2017)

Note that due to the currently limited information about the insulator and reflective pellets used in this experiment, they are currently not modeled in the BISON assessment cases.

Operating Conditions and Irradiation History

The actual power history for specific JOYO MK-II experiments is still being determined. Therefore, a simplified power history containing an initial ramp to power and hold for a given amount of time with a final power down is being used. The average burnup of the fuel at the end of the simulation is used as a check that the power history is reasonable. The parameters for the irradiation and temperature history are detailed in Table 2. Using an average linear heating rate of 70 kW/m, the final burnup reached in the BISON simulations is around 4.5 % FIMA (4.7 % FIMA for L413, and 4.4 % FIMA for L414).

The exact temperature history is also still being determined. In the meantime, the initial temperature is fixed to 298 K, and the temperature ramps up to the desired profile for the irradiation time before ramping down at the end of the simulation.

Table 2: SP-1 Operating Conditions

ParameterValueUnitsSource
Fast neutron fluxn cm sAoyama et al. (2004)
Max linear heating rate75kW/mTanaka et al. (2004)
Average linear heating rate70kW/mTanaka et al. (2004)
Burnup~4.3% FIMATanaka et al. (2004)
Irradiation duration276Equivalent full power daysTanaka et al. (2004)
Inlet temperature643.15KNomoto et al. (1980) and Aoyama et al. (2004)
Outlet temperature773.15KAoyama et al. (2004)
Average cladding temperature900KEstimated

Note that since the burnup [Material] block does not currently account for fuel enrichment, the full effect of the fuel enrichment in Pu and U-235 on burnup is not yet accounted for. This will need to be updated. Similarly, Tanaka et al. (2004) provides the linear heating rate as a function of burnup, which varies from 75 kW/m to below 65 kW/m. Currently, the linear heating rate is assumed to be fixed at 70 kW/m. This could also be updated once the burnup is updated.

Model Description

The L413 and L414 pins are modeled in BISON using a base input file titled JOYO_Pin_base.i (either with the full input file or using the action to create the necessary blocks), a file titled JOYO_Pin_options.i containing the information common to the three pins (e.g., rod design, irradiation conditions, etc.), and files containing the information specific to each pin, titled JOYO_Pin_options_L413.i, and JOYO_Pin_options_L414.i.

The specifications and conditions for all three pins are described below. Note that only the pins are being modeled, not the L4C4 compartment or the PFB090 fuel assembly.

Temperature Profile

Since the exact temperature profile on the surface of the cladding is unknown, it is assumed to follow a second degree polynomial with being the position along the cladding, and , , and constants defined to reproduce the provided inlet, outlet, and average temperatures in Kelvins provided in Table 2, as shown in Figure 1. To define the temperature profile, the average cladding temperature is estimated as provided in Table 2.

Figure 1: Temperature profile used to model L413 and L414 with informed inlet and outlet temperatures.

Power Profile

The exact power profile for these tests is still unknown. For now, as for the modelization of the JOYO MK-II Core, the FFTF power profile shown in Figure 2 is being used (Karahan, 2009).

Figure 2: Power peaking factors for FFTF and used for MK-II cores (Karahan, 2009).

Pressure Profile

The coolant pressure is unknown for now. The coolant is made out of sodium, and the pressure is assumed to be equal to 15.1 MPa.

Geometry and Mesh

The 2D-RZ mesh for the assessment case is generated with the internal smeared pellet meshing capability in BISON FuelRPinMeshGenerator.

All of the dimensions and meshing details are contained in the [Mesh] block.

Material and Behavioral Models

The following material and behavioral models for the MN fuel were used:

The following material and behavioral models are used for the 15Cr-20Ni stainless steel cladding. Note that due to the current lack of property data on 15Cr-20Ni stainless, the properties of SS316 are currently used:

  • SS316ElasticityTensor: Temperature-dependent Young's modulus and constant Poisson's ratio ()

  • SS316ThermalExpansionEigenstrain: Eigenstrain due to thermal expansion for Stainless Steel 316 using a function that describes the mean thermal expansion as a function of temperature

  • SS316CreepUpdate: Steady state creep as sum of thermal and irradiation creep following Altenbach and Gorash (2013) and Garner and Porter (1988)

  • SS316Thermal: Thermophysical material properties

  • To compute the density of SS316, a DerivativeParsedMaterial provides in kg/m, which is valid for T in Kelvin for 298.15 K T 1573.15 K (Mills, 2002)).

Note that thermal and mechanical contacts are modeled using mortar contact.

Input files

The input files for these assessment cases are located at bison/assessment/nitride/JOYO/J4C4/analysis.

To run the assessment cases, the input files and option files need to be combined into one by listing them in the command. For example, to run the assessment case for pin L413, one should list JOYO_Pin_options_L413.i JOYO_Pin_options.i JOYO_Pin_base.i, or JOYO_Pin_options_L413.i JOYO_Pin_options.i JOYO_Pin_base_action.i to use the action.

Results Comparison

The post-irradiation examinations (PIE) of the JOYO - L413 and JOYO - L414 pins provide the measurements listed in Table 3 and Table 4, respectively (Tanaka et al., 2004). The profilometry results provided in Tanaka et al. (2004) are reproduced in figure Figure 3. The profilometry data shown in figure Figure 3 is available in csv files titled JOYO_L413_profilometry_data_A-C.csv, JOYO_L413_profilometry_data_B-D.csv, JOYO_L413_profilometry_data_Average.csv, and JOYO_L414_profilometry_data_A-C.csv, JOYO_L414_profilometry_data_B-D.csv, JOYO_L414_profilometry_data_Average.csv.

Table 3: PIE data for JOYO - L413

QuantityMeasurementsUnitsSource
FGR XeUnknown
FGR KrUnknown
FGR total3.3%Tanaka et al. (2004)
Fuel swelling V/V7.4%Tanaka et al. (2004)
Max cladding strain D/D0.17%Tanaka et al. (2004)
Fuel density decrease5.8%Tanaka et al. (2004)
Change in cladding lengthUnknown
Open porosity4.2%Tanaka et al. (2004)
Closed porosity16.8%Tanaka et al. (2004)

Table 4: PIE data for JOYO - L414

QuantityMeasurementsUnitsSource
FGR XeUnknown
FGR KrUnknown
FGR total5.2%Tanaka et al. (2004)
Fuel swelling V/V6.7%Tanaka et al. (2004)
Max cladding strain D/D0.51%Tanaka et al. (2004)
Fuel density decrease5.4%Tanaka et al. (2004)
Change in cladding lengthUnknown
Open porosity4.1%Tanaka et al. (2004)
Closed porosity15.3%Tanaka et al. (2004)

Figure 3: Profilometry Results for L413 and L414 (Tanaka et al., 2004). A, B, C, and D are points on the outer diameter of the cladding positioned at 0, 90, 180, and 270 degrees, respectively.

The radial distribution of the area fraction of pores and the measured Xe content is also provided in Tanaka et al. (2004) for L414.

Discussion

The BISON simulation results have not yet been compared to the post-experiment examinations data.

References

  1. Holm Altenbach and Yevgen Gorash. High-temperature inelastic behavior of the austenitic steel aisi type 316. In Advanced Materials Modelling for Structures, pages 17–30. Springer, 2013.[BibTeX]
  2. Takafumi Aoyama, Takashi Sekine, and Shiro Tabuchi. Characterization of neutron field in the experimental fast reactor joyo for fuel and structural material irradiation test. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 228:21–34, 3 2004. doi:10.1016/J.NUCENGDES.2003.06.003.[BibTeX]
  3. FA Garner and DL Porter. Irradiation creep and swelling of aisi 316 to exposures of 130 dpa at 385-400 c. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 155:1006–1013, 1988.[BibTeX]
  4. Yoshihisa Ikusawa, Koji Maeda, Masato Kato, and Masayoshi Uno. Oxide-metal ratio dependence of central void formation of mixed oxide fuel irradiated in fast reactors. Nuclear Technology, pages 83–95, 2017.[BibTeX]
  5. Aydin Karahan. Modeling of thermo-mechanical and irradiation behavior of metallic and oxide fuels for sodium fast reactors. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Jun 2009. URL: https://tinyurl.com/y72vqvbn.[BibTeX]
  6. K. Maeda, K. Katsuyama, Y. Ikusawa, and S. Maeda. Short-term irradiation behavior of low-density americium-doped uranium-plutonium mixed oxide fuels irradiated in a fast reactor. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 416(1-2):158–165, Sep 2011.[BibTeX]
  7. K. C. Mills. Recommended Values of Thermophysical Properties for Selected Commercial Alloys. Technical Report, National Physical Laboratory, 2002.[BibTeX]
  8. S. Nomoto, H. Yamamoto, Y. Sekiguchi, and S. Tamura. Measurement of subassembly outlet coolant temperature in the joyo experimental fast reactor. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 62:233–239, 12 1980. doi:10.1016/0029-5493(80)90031-X.[BibTeX]
  9. Kosuke Tanaka, Koji Maeda, Kozo Katsuyama, Masaki Inoue, Takashi Iwai, and Yasuo Arai. Fission gas release and swelling in uranium–plutonium mixed nitride fuels. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 327:77–87, 5 2004. doi:10.1016/J.JNUCMAT.2004.01.002.[BibTeX]