EBR-II SP1 Experiments

buildconstruction:UN assessments under active modification

All nitride assessment cases are undergoing active modifications. At this time, the documenation here does not fully reflect the models in the input files. New documation that will be available soon will include improvements due to the new UNSifgrs model implementation.

Overview

The SP1 test was an accelerated irradiation test designed to demonstrate the irradiation performance of Nb-1%Zr clad UN fuel pins for the SP-100 space propulsion program. The UN pellets were loaded into Nb-1%Zr cladding tubes with a tungsten liner, irradiated in a fast-test reactor, EBR-II, and destructively examined after 0.8 at% burnup. Pin geometry, irradiation conditions, fuel swelling, fission-gas release, and microstructural data were published in (Dutt et al., 1984; Dutt et al., 1985; Matthews et al., 1988; Cowan et al., 1991).

Test Description

The SP1 test consisted of several helium-bonded UN and UO pins that were irradiated as part of the SP-100 program at high temperatures and relatively low burnup for space propulsion applications. Two of these pins with UN pellets were destructively examined and swelling and fission gas release were measured. These two pins, NBU-2 and NBU-3, are listed as assessment cases in BISON for UN fuel. The NBU-2 and NBU-3 pins had the same rod design and similar irradiation condition, with only the end burnup changing from 0.74 at% for NBU-2 to 0.81 at% for NBU-3.

Rod Design Specifications

The fuel was solid cylindrical pellets of UN. The pellet densities were around 87% TD, with calculated smear densities of around 80%. The pellets were encased in Nb-1%Zr clad with a chemical-vapor-deposited (CVD) tungsten liner. Table 1 lists the rod design specifications specifying if the value comes from a direct measurement or was unknown and had to be estimated or calculated.

Table 1: SP-1 Rod Geometry

ParameterValueUnitsSource
Clad materialNb-1%ZrMatthews et al. (1988)
BondingHeMatthews et al. (1988)
Pin length162.7mmMatthews et al. (1988)
Clad OD7.62mmMatthews et al. (1988)
Clad thickness0.635mmMatthews et al. (1988)
Liner length142.2mmMatthews et al. (1988)
Liner OD6.25mmMatthews et al. (1988)
Liner thickness0.127mmMatthews et al. (1988)
Diametral gap0.254mmMatthews et al. (1988)
Pellet diameter5.842mmMatthews et al. (1988)
Fuel stack76.2mmMatthews et al. (1988)
Top/bottom plug4.8mmEstimated from model in Matthews et al. (1988)
Bottom gap under pellet0.2mmEstimated
Plenum height76.9mmCalculated (Pin length-Fuel stack-2*Top/bottom plug-Bottom gap under pellet)
Plenum pressure12.4MPaEstimated (Blank (2006) max pressure allowed)
Smear density80%TDMatthews et al. (1988)

Operating Conditions and Irradiation History

Being tested in EBR-II, an irradiation test vehicle was used for the SP-1 tests to increase the obtainable temperature of the fuel pin cladding (Dutt et al., 1984). Cladding temperatures of 1300 to 1500 K were therefore obtained to be relevant to space propulsion conditions.

The actual power history for specific EBR-II experiments is still being determined. Therefore, a simplified power history containing an initial ramp to power and hold for a given amount of time with a final power down is being used. The average burnup of the fuel at the end of the simulation is used as a check that the power history is reasonable. The parameters for the irradiation and temperature history are detailed in Table 2. The final burnup reached in the BISON simulations is 0.80 at.%.

The exact temperature history is also still being determined. In the meantime, the initial temperature is fixed to 298 K, and the temperature ramps up to the desired profile for the irradiation time before ramping down at the end of the simulation.

Table 2: SP-1 Operating Conditions

ParameterValueUnitsSource
Fast fluencen cmMatthews et al. (1988)
Peak power80W/gMatthews et al. (1988)
Burnup (NBU-2)0.74at.%Matthews et al. (1988)
Burnup (NBU-3)0.81at.%Matthews et al. (1988)
Irradiation duration96Equivalent full power daysMatthews et al. (1988)
Coolant 1290KCowan et al. (1991)
Coolant 1350KCowan et al. (1991)
Average cladding temperature1500KMatthews et al. (1988)
Average fuel temperature1950KMatthews et al. (1988)

Model Description

The NBU-2 and NBU-3 pins from the SP1 tests are modeled in BISON in two different ways:

  • In one assessment case, only the fuel stack of the NBU-2 and NBU-3 cases is simulated. This case is called SP1_Fuel_focus.

  • In the other one, the cladding and the liner are also simulated. This case is called SP1_Pin.

The specifications and conditions for both cases are described below. Note that the irradiation test vehicle is not being modeled.

Temperature Profile

For the case SP1_Fuel_focus, the temperature at the surface of the fuel is fixed constant at the average fuel temperature calculated in (Matthews et al., 1988).

For the case SP1_Pin, since the exact temperature profile on the surface of the cladding is unknown, it is assumed to follow a second degree polynomial with being the position along the cladding, and , , and constants defined to reproduce the provided inlet, outlet, and average temperature in Kelvins provided in Table 2.

Power Profile

Concerning the power profile, the SP1 tests were performed in EBR-II. However, since the exact power profile is still unknown, it is assumed to be homogeneous along the fuel stack for both SP1_Fuel_focus and SP1_Pin cases.

Pressure Profile

No pressure is accounted for on the surface of the fuel pellet in the SP1_Fuel_focus case.

The coolant pressure in the SP1_Pin case is unknown. The coolant is made out of Lithium, and the pressure is assumed to be equal to 15.1 MPa.

Geometry and Mesh

For the case SP1_Fuel_focus, the 2D-RZ mesh for the fuel stack is generated with the internal rodlet meshing capability in BISON RodletMeshGenerator.

For the case SP1_Pin, The 2D-RZ mesh for the assessment case is generated with the internal smeared pellet meshing capability in BISON FuelPinMeshGenerator, which is able to model the Nb-1%Zr cladding with the tungsten liner.

All of the dimensions and meshing details are contained in the Mesh block.

Material and Behavioral Models

The following material and behavioral models for the UN fuel were used:

For the case SP1_Pin, the following material and behavioral models for the Nb-1%Zr (ASTM B391 Grade R04251) cladding were used:

  • ComputeIsotropicElasticityTensor: Computes isotropic elastic mechanical properties for generic material (elastic modulus of 68.9 GPa (ASM, 1993), Poisson's ratio of 0.4).

  • ComputeThermalExpansionEigenstrain: Computes eigenstrain due to thermal expansion with a constant coefficient (7.54 10 K for T 293.15, 673.15 K (Cverna and Committee., 2002; ASM, 1993)).

  • StrainAdjustedDensity: Computes density for a generic material (8590 kg/m at room temperature (Robbins and Finger, 1991; Cverna and Committee., 2002; ASM, 1993)).

  • HeatConductionMaterial: Computes thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity for generic material. In the case of Nb%Zr, the thermal conductivity is set as a constant 41.9 W/(m.K) (measured at 298.15 K) (Cverna and Committee., 2002; ASM, 1993) and the specific heat capacity is defined as a constant 270 J/(kg.K) (measured at 293.15 K) (Cverna and Committee., 2002; ASM, 1993)).

For the case SP1_Pin the following material and behavioral models for the tungsten liner were used in these cases:

For the case SP1_Pin, thermal and mechanical contacts are modeled using mortar contact.

Input files

The input files for both SP1_Fuel_focus and SP1_Pin cases are located at bison/assessment/nitride/EBRII/SP1/analysis.

Results Comparison

The post-experiment examinations of the NBU-2 and NBU-3 pins provide the measurements listed in Table 3 and Table 4, respectively.

Table 3: SP-1 Measurements for NBU-2

QuantityMeasurementsUnitsSource
FGR Xe5.7%Matthews et al. (1988)
FGR Kr5%Matthews et al. (1988)
FGR totalUnknown
Fuel swelling D/D3.5%Matthews et al. (1988)
Fuel swelling V/V8.9%Matthews et al. (1988)
Cladding strain D/D0.23%Matthews et al. (1988)
Fuel density decreaseUnknown
Change in cladding length1.2%Matthews et al. (1988)
Change in cladding OD3.6%Matthews et al. (1988)

Table 4: SP-1 Measurements for NBU-3

QuantityMeasurementsUnitsSource
FGR Xe7.9%Matthews et al. (1988)
FGR Kr7.1%Matthews et al. (1988)
FGR totalUnknown
Fuel swelling D/D3.7%Matthews et al. (1988)
Fuel swelling V/V8.3%Matthews et al. (1988)
Cladding strain D/D0.13%Matthews et al. (1988)
Fuel density decreaseUnknown
Change in cladding length1.2%Matthews et al. (1988)
Change in cladding OD3.6%Matthews et al. (1988)

Discussion

The BISON simulation results have not yet been compared to the post-experiment examinations data.

References

  1. ASM. ASM handbook Volume 2 - Properties and selection: Nonferrous alloys and special-purpose materials. Volume 2. ASM International, 1993. ISBN 978-0-87170-378-1.[BibTeX]
  2. Hubert Blank. Nonoxide Ceramic Nuclear Fuels, chapter, pages. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2006. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9783527603978.mst0108, doi:10.1002/9783527603978.mst0108.[BibTeX]
  3. Charles L. Cowan, Alan Chung, Samuel Kaplan, Thomas F. Marcille, Robert Protsik, and Samuel S. Stewart. Reactor design of the sp-100 nuclear assembly test. In AIP Conference Proceedings (American Institute of Physics); (USA), volume 217:1, 361–366. AIP Publishing, 1 1991. doi:10.1063/1.40010.[BibTeX]
  4. Fran. Cverna and ASM International. Materials Properties Database Committee. ASM ready reference. Thermal properties of metals. ASM International, 2002. ISBN 978-1-68015-944-8.[BibTeX]
  5. D S Dutt, C M Cox, R A Karnesky, and M K Millhollen. Performance testing of refractory alloy-clad fuel elements for space reactors (conference) | osti.gov. In 20. Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference. 8 1985. URL: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/5052097.[BibTeX]
  6. D S Dutt, C M Cox, and M K Millhollen. Performance of refractory alloy-clad fuel pins. In 2. Symposium on Space Nuclear Power Systems. 12 1984.[BibTeX]
  7. R. B. Matthews, K. M. Chidester, C. W. Hoth, R. E. Mason, and R. L. Petty. Fabrication and testing of uranium nitride fuel for space power reactors. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 151:345, 2 1988. doi:10.1016/0022-3115(88)90029-3.[BibTeX]
  8. W. H. Robbins and H.B. Finger. An historical perspective of the nerva nuclear rocket engine technology program. Technical Report NASA Contractor Report 187154, AIAA-91-3451, Analytical Engineering Corporation, Lewis Research Center, 7 1991.[BibTeX]