For software quality assurance purposes, TMAP8 undergoes verification and validation. Verification consists of comparing TMAP8 predictions against analytical solutions in different conditions, which are often simple cases. Validation consists of comparing TMAP8 predictions against experimental data.
Note that in addition to monitoring TMAP8 performance and reproducibility in verification and validation cases, the effects of changes made to TMAP8 are tracked. A series of automated tests are performed via continuous integration using CIVET to help identify any changes in TMAP8's predictions, therefore ensuring stability and robustness. When adding a new verification case, be sure to follow the verification and validation standards.
TMAP8 also contains example cases, which showcase how TMAP8 can be used. Finally, for more references of TMAP8 usage, a list of publications supporting TMAP8 development can be found here.
List of verification cases
List of benchmarking cases
Case | Title |
---|---|
ver-1fc | Conduction in Composite Structure with Constant Surface Temperatures |
fuel cycle 1 | Tritium fuel cycle in fusion energy plant from Abdou et al. (2021) |
fuel cycle 2 | Tritium fuel cycle in fusion energy plant from Meschini et al. (2023) |
List of validation cases
References
- Mohamed Abdou, Marco Riva, Alice Ying, Christian Day, Alberto Loarte, Larry R. Baylor, Paul Humrickhouse, Thomas F. Fuerst, and Seungyon Cho.
Physics and technology considerations for the deuterium–tritium fuel cycle and conditions for tritium fuel self sufficiency.
Nuclear Fusion, 61(1):013001, 2021.
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/abbf35, doi:10.1088/1741-4326/abbf35.[BibTeX]
- Samuele Meschini, Sara E Ferry, Rémi Delaporte-Mathurin, and Dennis G Whyte.
Modeling and analysis of the tritium fuel cycle for ARC-and STEP-class DT fusion power plants.
Nuclear Fusion, 63(12):126005, 2023.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/acf3fc.[BibTeX]