- flux_conversion_factorConvert fast neutron flux E>0.10 to E>0.18 MeV
C++ Type:double
Unit:(no unit assumed)
Controllable:No
Description:Convert fast neutron flux E>0.10 to E>0.18 MeV
- graphite_gradeA3_3_1800The grade of graphite A3_3_1800 A3_3_1950 A3_27_1800 A3_27_1950 H_451 IG_110 NG2020 PCEA NuclearGrade
Default:A3_3_1800
C++ Type:MooseEnum
Controllable:No
Description:The grade of graphite A3_3_1800 A3_3_1950 A3_27_1800 A3_27_1950 H_451 IG_110 NG2020 PCEA NuclearGrade
- packing_fractionVolumetric packing fraction (dimensionless) of particles
C++ Type:double
Unit:(no unit assumed)
Controllable:No
Description:Volumetric packing fraction (dimensionless) of particles
- temperatureCoupled temperature
C++ Type:std::vector<VariableName>
Unit:(no unit assumed)
Controllable:No
Description:Coupled temperature
GraphiteMatrixThermal
Computes thermal conductivity (W/m/K) and specific heat capacity (J/kg/K) for graphite matrix.
Description
A list of various graphite grades is provided in Table 1 along with the manufacturing descriptions. See Toptan et al. (2021) for more about the model implementations and Toptan et al. (2021) for homogenization techniques applied to the thermal conductivity for non-zero packing fraction.
Table 1: Graphite types.
| Grade | Coke source | Binder | Forming process | Vendor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A3-3 | Phenolic resin | Quasi-isostatic cold molding | Hobeg | |
| A3-27 | Synthesized resin 2 | Quasi-isostatic cold molding | Hobeg | |
| H-451 | Petroleum | Coal-tar pitch | Extrusion | Great Lakes Carbon Company |
| IG-110 | Petroleum | Coal-tar pitch | Isostatic pressing | ToyoTanso, Japan |
| PCEA | Petroleum | Extrusion | Graftech, USA | |
| 2020 | Petroleum | Molded | Mersen |
Thermal Conductivity
The thermal conductivity of the matrix material—used in both the fueled and fuel-free regions of TRISO fuel compacts/pebbles—is given for various graphite grades. The thermal conductivity of the fueled zone is based on a homogenization of TRISO particles in the matrix to produce an effective thermal conductivity (Toptan et al., 2021). The mathematical form of the correlation derived for the effective thermal conductivity applies to both the fueled (non-zero packing fraction) and fuel-free regions (zero packing fraction).
Grade H-451 graphite
The thermal conductivity of grade H-451 graphite is formulated according to NEA Nuclear Science Committee (2018) as a function of neutron fluence and temperature, which is considered valid over the temperature range 500 K, 1800 K. The mathematical formulations for the temperature-dependent thermal conductivity at various neutron fluence values are tabulated in Table 2.
Table 2: Thermal conductivity of grade H-451 graphite as a function of neutron fluence ( n/m) and temperature (K).
| Fluence ( n/m) | Thermal conductivity, (W/m-K) |
|---|---|
| 0.0 (unirradiated) | |
| 0.2 | |
| 0.5 | |
| 1.0 | |
| 3.0 | |
| 8.0 |
Grade 2020 graphite
The thermal conductivity of grade 2020 graphite is formulated according to NEA Nuclear Science Committee (2018) as a function of neutron fluence and temperature, which is considered valid over the temperature range 300 K, 2000 K. The mathematical formulations for the temperature-dependent thermal conductivity at various neutron fluence values are tabulated in Table 3.
Table 3: Thermal conductivity of grade 2020 graphite as a function of neutron fluence ( n/m) and temperature (K).
| Fluence ( n/m) | Thermal conductivity, (W/m-K) | Applicability |
|---|---|---|
| 0.0 (unirradiated) | ||
| 0.4 | ||
| 1.0 | ||
| 4.0 | ||
| 10.0 | ||
| 20.0 | ||
Grade A3-3 and A3-27 graphite
The thermal conductivity of the matrix material—used in both the fueled and fuel-free regions of TRISO fuel compacts/pebbles—is given by Miller et al. (2018) and Gontard and Nabielek (1990) for grade A3-3 and A3-27 graphite materials. A correlation is given for fast fluence with neutron energy threshold 0.18 MeV.
The thermal conductivity, (W/m-K) of the graphite matrix is where (W/m-K) is the temperature-dependent thermal conductivity of the unirradiated matrix material, (dimensionless) is a correction for irradiation damage, and (dimensionless) is a correction factor for densities other than the density of the reference material (1.7 g/cm).
The thermal conductivity (W/m-K) of the unirradiated matrix depends on the nature of the matrix material (A3-3 or A3-27) and the temperature of the final heat treatment during fabrication (1800 or 1950 ) (Gontard and Nabielek, 1990):
where the (W/m-K) is the thermal conductivity of material at 100 , the non-dimenstional, empirical coefficients, and , are tabulated in Table 4, and () is the temperature of the matrix. The material A3-3 heat-treated at 1800 is used by default.
Table 4: Coefficients for unirradiated thermal conductivity (Gontard and Nabielek, 1990).
| Material | (W/m-K) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A3-3 | 1800 | 50.8 | 1.1810 | -7.8453 |
| A3-3 | 1950 | 64.6 | 1.4079 | -9.0739 |
| A3-27 | 1800 | 47.4 | 9.7556 | -6.0360 |
| A3-27 | 1950 | 62.2 | 1.4621 | -9.6050 |
Neutron fluence decreases the thermal conductivity of the matrix. A correction factor (dimensionless) based on experimental data is applied to take the effect of irradiation damage into account (Gontard and Nabielek, 1990), which is given by
(1) where in terms of the temperature of the matrix, (), and (10 n/m, 0.18 MeV) is the fast neutron fluence. Note that in the original reference (Gontard and Nabielek, 1990), is mistakenly used instead of in the first instance of in Eq. (1).
Finally, a correction factor (dimensionless) is applied for densities other than the density of the reference material (1700 kg/m) used to obtain the experimental data on unirradiated material. It is given by Miller et al. (2018):
where (kg/m) is the density of the matrix (initial_matrix_density). The parameter initial_matrix_density may differ greatly from the compact density tracked by the "density" material property in fueled regions of the compact.
Grade IG-110 graphite
The original reference, JAEA report (Shibata et al., 2009) provides a model for the irradiated IG-110 thermal conductivity; however, the model given in the report has lack of information to regenerate the model behavior as shown in Figure 1.1.2 of the report. Therefore, the model was not integrated into the code. Additionally, the report doesn't provide a model for the unirradiated IG-110 thermal conductivity, a plot provided instead (see Figure 1.3.11 in the JAEA report). For this reason, the model behavior is captured via a polynomial function that is fit to the digitized data from Figure 1.3.11.
The unirradiated thermal conductivity of IG-110 graphite is digitized from Figure 1.3.11 in the JAEA report (Shibata et al., 2009) and fitted to a third-order polynomial function as follows: where is the thermal conductivity in W/m-K and is the temperature in C.
Grade PCEA graphite
The irradiated thermal conductivity of PCEA graphite, (W/m-K) is from Hawkes et al. (2015) and Snead and Burchell (1995) as: where is the unirradiated PCEA graphite, is the temperature in C, and is the number of displacements per carbon atom from fast neutrons. The multiplier used to convert fast fluence (0.18 MeV) to dpa is 8.23 dpa/(n/m) (Hawkes et al., 2015). Here, the thermal conductivity of unirradiated PCEA graphite, (W/m-K) is taken from Srinivasan and others (2021) and Swank et al. (2018), which is expressed as: where is the temperature in C.
Homogenization
The presence of TRISO particles in the matrix modifies its thermal conductivity. The homogenized (or effective) thermal conductivity of the graphite matrix containing TRISO particles () is computed according to seven modeling options available in the code (see Table 5). The models are formulated in terms of the graphite thermal conductivity (), the thermal conductivity of a TRISO particle (), and the packing fraction of TRISO particles within the graphite matrix (). The packing fraction is defined as the ratio of the volume of the TRISO particles to the volume of the embedding matrix: where (dimensionless) is the number of TRISO particles embedded in the matrix fueled region, (cm) is the average volume of a TRISO particle, and (cm) is the volume of the matrix fueled region (i.e., the volume containing TRISO particles). If the fuel element (compact or pebble) contains a fuel-free region, the volume of the fuel-free region is not included in the calculation of the packing fraction. The packing fraction is a fuel specification (i.e., a user input).
Table 5: Homogenization modeling options. and depend on the thermal conductivity of the TRISO particles (), and the graphite matrix (), are given by and .
| Model | Reference | Formulation |
|---|---|---|
| D-EMT | McLaughlin (1977) | |
| Chiew–Glandt | Chiew and Glandt (1983) | |
| Maxwell | Maxwell (1954) | |
| Reduced Maxwell | ||
| Bruggeman (or EMT) | Bruggeman (1935) | |
| Series (or harmonic mean) | ||
| Parallel (or volume average) |
The default modeling option, the differential effective medium theory (D-EMT) method, is recommended based on our analyses in Toptan et al. (2021). The D-EMT yields a cubic equation and we numerically solve this cubic equation according to the subroutine given in Toptan et al. (2020). The thermal conductivity of a TRISO particle was estimated based on its geometry and on the thermal conductivities of all its constituent layers (Folsom et al., 2015; Stainsby and others, 2009; Toptan et al., 2021). A value of 4.13 W/m-K has been adopted.
Specific Heat Capacity
A list of specific heat capacity correlations for graphite and its various grades are provided in Table 6. The specific heat capacity of grade 2020 graphite is considered to be the same as of grade H-451 graphite.
Table 6: Specific heat capacity modeling options. (kg/m) is the density of the graphite, is the temperature in Celcius, and is the temperature in Kelvin.
| Model | Reference | Formulation, (J/kg-K) | Range of applicability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon brick | IAEA (2000) | up to 1200 | |
| H-451 | Butland and Maddison (1973) | 250K to 3000K | |
| IG-110 | Srinivasan and others (2021) and Maruyama et al. (1995) | up to 800C |
If the temperature is out of valid temperature boundaries, the specific heat capacity value at the temperature boundary is used. Note that the input parameter specific_heat_scale_factor can be used to scale the specific heat capacity.
Homogenization
The presence of TRISO particles affects the specific heat capacity of a fueled matrix. A simple volumetric-average homogenization method is applied first to the particle and then to the fueled matrix. The TRISO particle homogenized specific heat may be supplied. The default value of 748.72 J/kg-K is provided from Cho et al. (2009) where the particle characteristics in Table 7 are volumetric-average homogenized.
Table 7: Default TRISO Particle Characteristics for Homogenization
| Material | Radius (cm) | Specific Heat (J/kg-K) |
|---|---|---|
| UO Kernel | 0.0251 | 312 |
| Buffer | 0.03425 | 710 |
| Inner PyC | 0.03824 | 710 |
| SiC | 0.04177 | 1300 |
| Outer PyC | 0.04577 | 710 |
The packing fraction is used to homogenize the TRISO particle specific heat with the calculated specific heat of the matrix as
If the packing fraction is zero, then an un-fueled graphite matrix specific heat is calculated.
Example Input Syntax
[Materials<<<{"href": "../../syntax/Materials/index.html"}>>>]
[matrix_thermal_props]
type = GraphiteMatrixThermal<<<{"description": "Computes thermal conductivity (W/m/K) and specific heat capacity (J/kg/K) for graphite matrix.", "href": "GraphiteMatrixThermal.html"}>>>
flux_conversion_factor<<<{"description": "Convert fast neutron flux E>0.10 to E>0.18 MeV"}>>> = 0.8
packing_fraction<<<{"description": "Volumetric packing fraction (dimensionless) of particles"}>>> = 0.35
etc_model<<<{"description": "Option for the correlation used to compute effective thermal conductivity (ETC)"}>>> = DEMT
temperature<<<{"description": "Coupled temperature"}>>> = temp
initial_matrix_density<<<{"description": "Initial pure matrix density value for A3-3 or A3-27 graphite (kg/m^3)."}>>> = 1200.0
outputs<<<{"description": "Vector of output names where you would like to restrict the output of variables(s) associated with this object"}>>> = all
[]
[](test/tests/triso/graphite_matrix_thermal/demt.i)Input Parameters
- TRISO_conductivity4.13Particle thermal conductivity (W/m-K)
Default:4.13
C++ Type:double
Unit:(no unit assumed)
Controllable:No
Description:Particle thermal conductivity (W/m-K)
- TRISO_specific_heat748.72Particle specific heat (J/kg-K)
Default:748.72
C++ Type:double
Unit:(no unit assumed)
Controllable:No
Description:Particle specific heat (J/kg-K)
- base_nameOptional parameter that allows the user to define multiple material systems on the same block, i.e. for multiple phases
C++ Type:std::string
Controllable:No
Description:Optional parameter that allows the user to define multiple material systems on the same block, i.e. for multiple phases
- blockThe list of blocks (ids or names) that this object will be applied
C++ Type:std::vector<SubdomainName>
Controllable:No
Description:The list of blocks (ids or names) that this object will be applied
- boundaryThe list of boundaries (ids or names) from the mesh where this object applies
C++ Type:std::vector<BoundaryName>
Controllable:No
Description:The list of boundaries (ids or names) from the mesh where this object applies
- computeTrueWhen false, MOOSE will not call compute methods on this material. The user must call computeProperties() after retrieving the MaterialBase via MaterialBasePropertyInterface::getMaterialBase(). Non-computed MaterialBases are not sorted for dependencies.
Default:True
C++ Type:bool
Controllable:No
Description:When false, MOOSE will not call compute methods on this material. The user must call computeProperties() after retrieving the MaterialBase via MaterialBasePropertyInterface::getMaterialBase(). Non-computed MaterialBases are not sorted for dependencies.
- constant_onNONEWhen ELEMENT, MOOSE will only call computeQpProperties() for the 0th quadrature point, and then copy that value to the other qps.When SUBDOMAIN, MOOSE will only call computeQpProperties() for the 0th quadrature point, and then copy that value to the other qps. Evaluations on element qps will be skipped
Default:NONE
C++ Type:MooseEnum
Controllable:No
Description:When ELEMENT, MOOSE will only call computeQpProperties() for the 0th quadrature point, and then copy that value to the other qps.When SUBDOMAIN, MOOSE will only call computeQpProperties() for the 0th quadrature point, and then copy that value to the other qps. Evaluations on element qps will be skipped
- declare_suffixAn optional suffix parameter that can be appended to any declared properties. The suffix will be prepended with a '_' character.
C++ Type:MaterialPropertyName
Unit:(no unit assumed)
Controllable:No
Description:An optional suffix parameter that can be appended to any declared properties. The suffix will be prepended with a '_' character.
- densitydensityName of density material property.
Default:density
C++ Type:MaterialPropertyName
Unit:(no unit assumed)
Controllable:No
Description:Name of density material property.
- etc_modelDEMTOption for the correlation used to compute effective thermal conductivity (ETC)
Default:DEMT
C++ Type:MooseEnum
Controllable:No
Description:Option for the correlation used to compute effective thermal conductivity (ETC)
- fast_neutron_fluencefast_neutron_fluenceCoupled fast (E>0.10 MeV) neutron fluence (n/m^2)
Default:fast_neutron_fluence
C++ Type:MaterialPropertyName
Unit:(no unit assumed)
Controllable:No
Description:Coupled fast (E>0.10 MeV) neutron fluence (n/m^2)
- initial_matrix_density1700Initial pure matrix density value for A3-3 or A3-27 graphite (kg/m^3).
Default:1700
C++ Type:double
Unit:(no unit assumed)
Controllable:No
Description:Initial pure matrix density value for A3-3 or A3-27 graphite (kg/m^3).
Optional Parameters
- control_tagsAdds user-defined labels for accessing object parameters via control logic.
C++ Type:std::vector<std::string>
Controllable:No
Description:Adds user-defined labels for accessing object parameters via control logic.
- enableTrueSet the enabled status of the MooseObject.
Default:True
C++ Type:bool
Controllable:Yes
Description:Set the enabled status of the MooseObject.
- implicitTrueDetermines whether this object is calculated using an implicit or explicit form
Default:True
C++ Type:bool
Controllable:No
Description:Determines whether this object is calculated using an implicit or explicit form
- seed0The seed for the master random number generator
Default:0
C++ Type:unsigned int
Controllable:No
Description:The seed for the master random number generator
- use_displaced_meshFalseWhether or not this object should use the displaced mesh for computation. Note that in the case this is true but no displacements are provided in the Mesh block the undisplaced mesh will still be used.
Default:False
C++ Type:bool
Controllable:No
Description:Whether or not this object should use the displaced mesh for computation. Note that in the case this is true but no displacements are provided in the Mesh block the undisplaced mesh will still be used.
Advanced Parameters
- output_propertiesList of material properties, from this material, to output (outputs must also be defined to an output type)
C++ Type:std::vector<std::string>
Controllable:No
Description:List of material properties, from this material, to output (outputs must also be defined to an output type)
- outputsnone Vector of output names where you would like to restrict the output of variables(s) associated with this object
Default:none
C++ Type:std::vector<OutputName>
Controllable:No
Description:Vector of output names where you would like to restrict the output of variables(s) associated with this object
Outputs Parameters
- prop_getter_suffixAn optional suffix parameter that can be appended to any attempt to retrieve/get material properties. The suffix will be prepended with a '_' character.
C++ Type:MaterialPropertyName
Unit:(no unit assumed)
Controllable:No
Description:An optional suffix parameter that can be appended to any attempt to retrieve/get material properties. The suffix will be prepended with a '_' character.
- use_interpolated_stateFalseFor the old and older state use projected material properties interpolated at the quadrature points. To set up projection use the ProjectedStatefulMaterialStorageAction.
Default:False
C++ Type:bool
Controllable:No
Description:For the old and older state use projected material properties interpolated at the quadrature points. To set up projection use the ProjectedStatefulMaterialStorageAction.
Material Property Retrieval Parameters
- specific_heat_scale_factor1Optional scaling factor applied to the overall specific heat.
Default:1
C++ Type:double
Unit:(no unit assumed)
Controllable:No
Description:Optional scaling factor applied to the overall specific heat.
- thermal_conductivity_scale_factor1Optional scaling factor applied to the overall thermal conductivity.
Default:1
C++ Type:double
Unit:(no unit assumed)
Controllable:No
Description:Optional scaling factor applied to the overall thermal conductivity.
Advanced: Scaling Factors Parameters
Input Files
- (test/tests/triso_pebble/1D_pebble_from_csv.i)
- (test/tests/solid_mechanics/graphite_grade_elasticity_tensor/test.i)
- (test/tests/triso/graphite_matrix_thermal/bruggeman.i)
- (test/tests/triso/graphite_matrix_thermal/chiew_glandt.i)
- (test/tests/triso/graphite_matrix_thermal/demt.i)
- (test/tests/triso/graphite_matrix_thermal/reduced_maxwell.i)
- (test/tests/triso/graphite_matrix_thermal/parallel.i)
- (test/tests/triso_pebble/3D_pebble.i)
- (examples/TRISO/pebble/3D_pebble_with_failed_particles.i)
- (test/tests/triso/graphite_matrix_thermal/grade_pcea.i)
- (test/tests/triso_pebble/1D_pebble_picard.i)
- (test/tests/triso_pebble/3D_pebble_location_from_file.i)
- (test/tests/triso/graphite_matrix_thermal/maxwell.i)
- (assessment/TRISO/validation/AGR-34/SharedFiles/capsule_base.i)
- (test/tests/triso/graphite_matrix_thermal/grade_h_451.i)
- (examples/TRISO/pebble/3D_pebble.i)
- (test/tests/triso/graphite_matrix_thermal/series.i)
- (test/tests/triso/graphite_matrix_thermal/exact.i)
- (test/tests/triso_pebble/1D_pebble.i)
- (test/tests/triso/graphite_matrix_thermal/grade_ig_110.i)
- (test/tests/triso_pebble/3D_pebble_from_csv.i)
References
- D.A.G. Bruggeman.
Berechnung verschiedener physikalischer konstanten von heterogenen substanzen. i. dielektrizitätskonstanten und leitfähigkeiten der mischköorper aus isotropen substanzen.
Annalen der physik, 416(7):636–664, 1935.
doi:10.1002/andp.19354160705.[BibTeX]
- A.T.D. Butland and R.J. Maddison.
The specific heat of graphite: An evaluation of measurements.
Journal of Nuclear Materials, 49(1):45–56, 1973.
doi:10.1016/0022-3115(73)90060-3.[BibTeX]
- Y. C. Chiew and E. D. Glandt.
The effect of structure on the conductivity of a dispersion.
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 91(1):90–104, 1983.
doi:10.1016/0021-9797(83)90238-2.[BibTeX]
- Nam Zin Cho, Hui Yu, and Jong Woon Kim.
Two-temperature homogenized model for steady-state and transient thermal analyses of a pebble with distributed fuel particles.
Annals of Nuclear Energy, 36:448–457, May 2009.
URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030645490800323X, doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2008.11.031.[BibTeX]
- Charles Folsom, Changhu Xing, Colby Jensen, Heng Ban, and Douglas W. Marshall.
Experimental measurement and numerical modeling of the effective thermal conductivity of TRISO fuel compacts.
Journal of Nuclear Materials, 458:198–205, 2015.
doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.12.042.[BibTeX]
- R. Gontard and H. Nabielek.
Performance Evaluation of Modern HTR TRISO Fuels.
Report HTA-1B-05/90, Forschungszentrums Juelich, July 1990.[BibTeX]
- G. L. Hawkes, J. W. Sterbentz, and B. T. Pham.
Sensitivity evaluation of the AGR 3-4 experiment thermal model irradiated in the advanced test reactor.
In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, volume 6B: Energy. 11 2015.
doi:10.1115/IMECE2015-53544.[BibTeX]
- T. Maruyama, T. Kaito, S. Onose, and I. Shibahara.
Change in physical properties of high density isotropic graphites irradiated in the ‘JOYO’ fast reactor.
Journal of Nuclear Materials, 225:267–272, 1995.
doi:10.1016/0022-3115(95)00051-8.[BibTeX]
- J. C. Maxwell.
A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism.
Oxford University Press, Dover, New York, 3rd edition, 1954.[BibTeX]
- R. McLaughlin.
A study of the differential scheme for composite materials.
Int. J. Eng. Sci., 15(4):237–244, 1977.
doi:10.1016/ 0020- 7225(77)90058- 1.[BibTeX]
- G.K. Miller, D.A. Petti, J.T. Maki, D.L. Knudson, and W.F. Skerjanc.
PARFUME Theory and Model Basis Report.
Report INL/EXT-08-14497 (Rev.1), Idaho National Laboratory, September 2018.[BibTeX]
- T. Shibata, M. Eto, E. Kunimoto, S. Shiozawa, K. Sawa, Oku T., and T. Maruyama.
Draft of standard for graphite core components in high temperature gas-cooled reactor.
Technical Report JAEAResearch2009-042, JAEA, 2009.
URL: https://jopss.jaea.go.jp/pdfdata/JAEA-Research-2009-042.pdf.[BibTeX]
- L. L. Snead and T. D. Burchell.
Reduction in thermal conductivity due to neutron irradiation.
In 22nd Biennial Conference on Carbon, 774–775. 1995.[BibTeX]
- M. Srinivasan and others.
Appendices to the assessment of graphite properties and degradation, including source dependence.
Technical Report TLR/RES/DE/REB-2021-08, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commision, 8 2021.
URL: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2121/ML21215A346.pdf.[BibTeX]
- R. Stainsby and others.
Investigation of local heat transfer phenomena in a pebble bed HTGR core.
Technical Report NR001/RP/002 R01, AMEC, May 2009.[BibTeX]
- W. D. Swank, D. T. Rohrbaugh, D. L. Cottle, and W. E. Windes.
High temperature annealing of irradiated graphite.
Technical Report INL/CON-18-45742 (Rev. 0), Idaho National Laboratory, 2018.
URL: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1484477.[BibTeX]
- A. Toptan, W. Jiang, S. R. Novascone, and J. D. Hales.
Matrix graphite material models in pebbles and compacts for Bison.
Tech. Rep. INL/EXT-21-64643, Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID United States, 9 2021.
URL: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1825268, doi:10.2172/1825268.[BibTeX]
- Aysenur Toptan, Jason D. Hales, Richard L. Williamson, Stephen R. Novascone, Giovanni Pastore, and David J. Kropaczek.
Modeling of gap conductance for LWR fuel rods applied in the BISON code.
Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 57(8):963–974, 2020.
doi:10.1080/00223131.2020.1740808.[BibTeX]
- Aysenur Toptan, Wen Jiang, Jason D. Hales, Benjamin W. Spencer, Albert Casagranda, and Stephen R. Novascone.
FEA-aided investigation of the effective thermal conductivity in a medium with embedded spheres.
Nuclear Engineering and Design, 381:111355, 2021.
doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111355.[BibTeX]
- IAEA.
Heat Transport and Afterheat Removal for Gas Cooled Reactors Under Accident Conditions.
Technical Report TECDOC-1163, International Atomic Energy Agency, 2000.[BibTeX]
- NEA Nuclear Science Committee.
Nea benchmark of the modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactor-350 mw core design: volumes i and ii.
Technical Report NEA/NSC/R(2017)4, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2018.
URL: https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=NEA/NSC/R(2017)4&docLanguage=En.[BibTeX]