ver-1fd

Convective Heating

General Case Description

The fourth heat transfer problem taken from Ambrosek and Longhurst (2008) builds on the capabilities verified in ver-1fa, ver-1fb, and ver-1fc. The configuration is the same as in ver-1fb, except that, the current case has a convection boundary. This case is simulated in (test/tests/ver-1fd/ver-1fd.i)

The case focuses on the heating of a semi-infinite slab by convection at the boundary. The slab is initially configured with a constant temperature of 100 K throughout the slab. A convection boundary is activated at the surface from time s. The convection temperature is in the enclosure is K. In the slab, the conduction coefficient is W, the thermal conductivity is W/m/K, and the thermal diffusivity is m/s.

Analytical solution

The analytical solution is provided by Incropera and DeWitt (2002):

(1) where K is the initial temperature, K is the temperature of the enclosure, W/m/K is the conduction coefficient, W/m/K is the thermal conductivity, is the complimentary error function, is the position in the slab in m, and (2) is the thermal diffusivity. The volumetric specific heat is defined as J/m/K, which gives us m/s.

Note that the simulated length of the semi-infinite slab is not explicitely specified in Ambrosek and Longhurst (2008). In TMAP8, a length of cm with a zero-flux boundary condition at the end was found to be sufficient to match the analytical solution (i.e., the temperature at the desired position cm is not affected by the boundary condition at position ), as shown in Figure 1.

warningwarning:Typo in Ambrosek and Longhurst (2008)

In Ambrosek and Longhurst (2008), the value of W/m/K is provided, whereas the input file lists W/m/K. In TMAP8, we have decided to use W/m/K since it provides the same results as those shown in Figure 9 in Ambrosek and Longhurst (2008), and provides the appropriate value for . Moreover, Ambrosek and Longhurst (2008) lists m/s in the documentation, but the input file lists instead of . TMAP8 assumes a density and specific heat value to match to reproduce TMAP7's input file rather than documentation.

Results

The comparison between TMAP8 predictions and the analytical solution is performed at depth cm. These results are shown in Figure 1. They show great agreement between TMAP8 and the analytical solution with a root mean square percentage error of RMSPE = 0.29 %.

Figure 1: Comparison of temperature profiles for convective heating in a semi-infinite slab from the analytical solution and TMAP8 at depth cm. The RMSPE is the root mean square percentage error between the analytical solution and TMAP8 predictions.

Input files

The input file for this case can be found at (test/tests/ver-1fd/ver-1fd.i), which is also used as test in TMAP8 at (test/tests/ver-1fd/tests).

References

  1. James Ambrosek and GR Longhurst. Verification and Validation of TMAP7. Technical Report INEEL/EXT-04-01657, Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, December 2008.[BibTeX]
  2. F. P. Incropera and D. P. DeWitt. Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer. John Wiley & Sons, 5th edition, 2002.[BibTeX]