libMesh/libmesh: coverage diff

Base 76e4e4 Head #4633 e303c2
Total Total +/- New
Rate 66.54% 66.55% +0.00% -
Hits 80725 80727 +2 0
Misses 40586 40583 -3 0
Filename Stmts Miss Cover
include/numerics/petsc_vector.h -1 0 -0.09%
src/mesh/distributed_mesh.C 0 -2 +0.24%
src/mesh/mesh_triangle_holes.C 0 -1 +0.28%
TOTAL -1 -3 +0.00%
code
coverage unchanged
code
coverage increased
code
coverage decreased
+
line added or modified

src/mesh/distributed_mesh.C

1617  
1618  
1619  
1620  
1621  
1622  
1623  
1624  
1625  
1626  
1627  
1628  
1629  
1630  

                      sender_could_become_owner)
                    {
                      if (it != repartitioned_node_pids.end() &&
                          pid < it->second)
                        it->second = pid;
                      else
                        repartitioned_node_pids[n] = pid;
                    }
                  else
                    if (it == repartitioned_node_pids.end())
                      repartitioned_node_pids[n] =
                        DofObject::invalid_processor_id;

                  repartitioned_node_sets_to_push[pid].insert(n);

src/mesh/mesh_triangle_holes.C

276  
277  
278  
279  
280  
281  
282  

    {
      ray_target = inside - Point(1);
      intersection_distances =
        this->find_ray_intersections(inside, ray_target);
    }

  // I'd make this an assert, but I'm not 100% confident we can't