libMesh/libmesh coverage diff: #4510 (71b108) with base 165cb7

libMesh/libmesh: coverage diff

	Base 165cb7	Head #4510 71b108
	Total	Total	+/-	New
Rate	65.82%	65.82%	+0.00%	100.00%
Hits	79325	79327	+2	4
Misses	41198	41197	-1	0

Filename	Stmts	Miss	Cover
src/mesh/distributed_mesh.C	0	-2	+0.25%
src/mesh/mesh_generation.C	+1	0	+0.01%
src/mesh/mesh_triangle_holes.C	0	+1	-0.27%
TOTAL	+1	-1	+0.00%

code: coverage unchanged
code: coverage increased
code: coverage decreased
+: line added or modified

src/mesh/distributed_mesh.C

                      sender_could_become_owner)
                    {
                      if (it != repartitioned_node_pids.end() &&
                          pid < it->second)
                        it->second = pid;
                      else
                        repartitioned_node_pids[n] = pid;
                    }
                  else
                    if (it == repartitioned_node_pids.end())
                      repartitioned_node_pids[n] =
                        DofObject::invalid_processor_id;

                  repartitioned_node_sets_to_push[pid].insert(n);

src/mesh/mesh_generation.C

          }
        else // !gauss_lobatto_grid
          {
            for (Node * node : mesh.node_ptr_range())
              {
                (*node)(0) = ((*node)(0))*(xmax-xmin) + xmin;
                (*node)(1) = ((*node)(1))*(ymax-ymin) + ymin;
                (*node)(2) = ((*node)(2))*(zmax-zmin) + zmin;
              }
          }

src/mesh/mesh_triangle_holes.C

    {
      ray_target = inside - Point(1);
      intersection_distances =
        this->find_ray_intersections(inside, ray_target);
    }

  // I'd make this an assert, but I'm not 100% confident we can't