libMesh/libmesh: coverage diff

Base 96ddf2 Head #4277 2ed938
Total Total +/- New
Rate 65.00% 65.00% -0.00% -
Hits 76930 76927 -3 0
Misses 41430 41430 - 0
Filename Stmts Miss Cover
src/geom/elem.C -3 -3 +0.17%
src/mesh/distributed_mesh.C 0 +2 -0.25%
src/mesh/mesh_triangle_holes.C 0 +1 -0.27%
TOTAL -3 0 -0.00%
code
coverage unchanged
code
coverage increased
code
coverage decreased
+
line added or modified

src/mesh/distributed_mesh.C

1537  
1538  
1539  
1540  
1541  
1542  
1543  
1544  
1545  
1546  
1547  
1548  
1549  
1550  

                      sender_could_become_owner)
                    {
                      if (it != repartitioned_node_pids.end() &&
                          pid < it->second)
                        it->second = pid;
                      else
                        repartitioned_node_pids[n] = pid;
                    }
                  else
                    if (it == repartitioned_node_pids.end())
                      repartitioned_node_pids[n] =
                        DofObject::invalid_processor_id;

                  repartitioned_node_sets_to_push[pid].insert(n);

src/mesh/mesh_triangle_holes.C

270  
271  
272  
273  
274  
275  
276  

    {
      ray_target = inside - Point(1);
      intersection_distances =
        this->find_ray_intersections(inside, ray_target);
    }

  // I'd make this an assert, but I'm not 100% confident we can't