For software quality assurance purposes, TMAP8 undergoes verification and validation. Verification consists of comparing TMAP8 predictions against analytical solutions in different conditions, which are often simple cases. Validation consists of comparing TMAP8 predictions against experimental data.

Note that in addition to monitoring TMAP8 performance and reproducibility in verification and validation cases, the effects of changes made to TMAP8 are tracked. A series of automated tests are performed via continuous integration using CIVET to help identify any changes in TMAP8's predictions, therefore ensuring stability and robustness. When adding a new verification case, be sure to follow the verification and validation standards.

TMAP8 also contains example cases, which showcase how TMAP8 can be used. Finally, for more references of TMAP8 usage, a list of publications supporting TMAP8 development can be found here.

List of verification cases

CaseTitle
ver-1aDepleting Source Problem
ver-1bDiffusion Problem with Constant Source Boundary Condition
ver-1cDiffusion Problem with Partially Preloaded Slab
ver-1dPermeation Problem with Trapping
ver-1dcPermeation Problem with Multiple Trapping - including the method of manufactured solutions
ver-1ddPermeation Problem without Trapping
ver-1eDiffusion in Composite Material Layers
ver-1faHeat Conduction with Heat Generation
ver-1fbThermal Transient
ver-1fcConduction in Composite Structure with Constant Surface Temperatures
ver-1fdConvective Heating
ver-1gSimple Forward Chemical Reaction
ver-1gcSeries Chemical Reactions
ver-1haConvective Gas Outflow Problem in Three Enclosures
ver-1hbConvective Gas Outflow Problem in Equilibrating Enclosures
ver-1iaSpecies Equilibration Problem in Ratedep Condition with Equal Starting Pressures
ver-1ibSpecies Equilibration Problem in Ratedep Condition with Unequal Starting Pressures
ver-1icSpecies Equilibration Problem in Surfdep Conditions with Low Barrier Energy
ver-1idSpecies Equilibration Problem in Surfdep Conditions with High Barrier Energy
ver-1ieSpecies Equilibration Problem in Lawdep Condition with Equal Starting Pressures
ver-1ifSpecies Equilibration Problem in Lawdep Condition with Unequal Starting Pressures
ver-1jaRadioactive Decay of Mobile Tritium in a Slab
ver-1jbRadioactive Decay of Mobile Tritium in a Slab with a Distributed Trap Concentration
ver-1kaSimple Volumetric Source
ver-1kbHenry’s Law Boundaries with No Volumetric Source
ver-1kc-1Sieverts’ Law Boundaries with No Volumetric Source
ver-1kc-2Sieverts’ Law Boundaries with Chemical Reaction and No Volumetric Source
ver-1kdSieverts’ Law Boundaries with Chemical Reaction and Volumetric Source

List of benchmarking cases

List of validation cases

References

  1. Mohamed Abdou, Marco Riva, Alice Ying, Christian Day, Alberto Loarte, Larry R. Baylor, Paul Humrickhouse, Thomas F. Fuerst, and Seungyon Cho. Physics and technology considerations for the deuterium–tritium fuel cycle and conditions for tritium fuel self sufficiency. Nuclear Fusion, 61(1):013001, 2021. URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/abbf35, doi:10.1088/1741-4326/abbf35.[BibTeX]
  2. Samuele Meschini, Sara E Ferry, Rémi Delaporte-Mathurin, and Dennis G Whyte. Modeling and analysis of the tritium fuel cycle for ARC-and STEP-class DT fusion power plants. Nuclear Fusion, 63(12):126005, 2023. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/acf3fc.[BibTeX]